![]() ![]() Truth is, most DJs nowadays tend to put up with or try to find workarounds for the increasingly bloated nature of iTunes (videos, radio, podcasts, and now Apple Music, all shoehorned in there).Īs iTunes becomes an entertainment hub rather than a music file management program, it inevitably moves away from what us DJs really need: A clean, easy to use program for fixing our metadata, making playlists, and listening to our music when we’re not actually DJing.įor many, this last week’s update to 12.2 with its push towards streaming music and the issues faced with it not playing nicely with DJ software and even corrupting whole libraries has forced a rethink of whether it is actually a good idea to use it at all. So what’s the issue? Apple’s new Apple Music streaming service is the biggest draw for installing iTunes 12.2, but it comes at a cost for DJs – some users have reported corrupted music libraries after updating. There is no other music library software that can do this. That means any work you do in iTunes to organise your music using smart playlists and so on is faithfully reproduced right there in your DJ software’s library. The other reason DJs use it is that it’s there in all DJ software. And it makes it easy to organise your music due to that familiarity (not to mention the ease of putting your music onto the iPod, then later the iPhone). Firstly, from the very first iPods onwards, iTunes has just been… there. They organise their music themselves in folders, use specialist tagging programs, or simply use their DJ software to organise their music, and fail to understand why anyone would want to use iTunes to do this at all – especially DJs. Many DJs who don’t use iTunes ask this question whenever issues like this arise. So today we’re asking: Is it now time for DJs to ditch using iTunes altogether in their music preparation? Why use iTunes at all? With the latest iTunes 12.2 update incorporating Apple Music and therefore swinging firmly towards streaming media and online services, and reportedly breaking more than a few users’ local music libraries along the way, the outcry against the program among DJs is louder than ever. Take a look of the source code of the to see how they tag their images to make Google index their site.With how feature-laden iTunes has become, is it time for DJs to bypass it completely in favour of something simpler? We examine the possibilities in this post… Since you haven't placed any meaningful "title" and "alt" tags on your site, Google thinks it is with no content, and worse, Google thinks your meta-tag description of your site is just black-hat SEO trickery and refuses to display it. ![]() Your site consists almost entirely of images, which - just by themselves - Google don't consider "content" (hence Google using the AUP, which is about the only text of substance to be found). However, I think your main problem vis a vis Google is total lack of content. ![]() If you use it Google will usually recrawl the URL submitted within 48 hours (but there are no guarantees, and Google may start to ignore you if you abuse it). However, in GWT there is a "Submit URL to Index"-tool. Which - based upon your public PR - is not too hot at the moment. How fast your site is automatically recrawled depends, among other things, on your Google karma. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |